Kim Wilson Housing recently published the results of a months-long research effort into the costs of various housing and other interventions in Kansas. Broadly, I think its results match those of similar studies done previously nationwide, and reinforce the excellent cost/benefit value of permanent supportive housing and rapid re-housing.
Read the report for yourself right here: Cost Benefit Analysis for KS 2014-final
- Keeping Kansans homeless is very expensive! A person experiencing homelessness in Kansas accesses about $153.00 of services – including ambulance and ER services, encounters with police, emergency shelter, etc. – per day. In contrast, permanent supportive housing (which decreases uses of these other services drastically) costs about $29 per day for scattered-site projects (i.e. rent vouchers and wrap-around services). Budget-minded taxpayers ought to favor increasing permanent supportive housing, it seems to me!
- The cost of an ambulance ride plus an emergency room visit is roughly equal to that of providing 61 days of permanent supportive housing in a scattered site project. ER “frequent fliers” can access the ER several times per month; identifying and housing these folks drastically improve their health, along with saving money!
The way we do things now results in huge, mostly hidden, costs to all of us for emergency health, police, and housing services. There are better ways that, together, communities across the country are working toward. They have to make sense locally, but they all include improved data systems, collection, and reporting, re-allocation of resources toward permanent supportive housing and rapid re-housing, and housing first-style priorities (i.e. our system does not prolong someone’s homelessness due to addiction, lack of “job readiness,” criminal record, etc.).
If you had a housing crisis tonight, which system would you want to encounter? The one we have now? Or the one we’re building?